Investments for people aged 46–50 in San Francisco
Everything invested in markets — brokerage, retirement accounts and employer plans combined.
Half of people aged 46–50 in San Francisco have a total invested above $55,100. Reaching the upper quarter takes about $343,850, and the top 10% starts at $1,497,825 — roughly 27.2× the median. The lower quarter sits below $0, and the bottom 10% is under $0.
The full distribution
| Percentile | Investments | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Bottom 10% | $0 | 9 in 10 are above this |
| Lower quarter | $0 | 25th percentile |
| Median | $55,100 | half above, half below |
| Upper quarter | $343,850 | 75th percentile |
| Top 10% | $1,497,825 | only 1 in 10 is above this |
| Average (mean) | $68,875 | pulled up by the top end — the median is the better "typical" |
Get this cohort's numbers when they move.
One email on the 1st: the median and top-10% total invested for people aged 46–50 in San Francisco, what changed since last month, and how many members joined. No account, no spam, one-click unsubscribe.
You'll get the current figures right away, then monthly. Keeping Up Inc, New York. Privacy.
This page is the cohort. An account puts you on it.
- Your rank, kept current. Type a rough figure and your percentile sits on your dashboard, moving as the cohort does.
- Six ranks, not one. Net worth, income, savings rate, spending, retirement and investments against people aged 46–50 in San Francisco.
- Exact when you want it. Connect accounts read-only later for the real number; nothing is required to start.
Just want the number? Try the percentile calculator — no signup, nothing leaves your browser.
Investments by age in San Francisco
| Age | Lower quarter | Median investments | Upper quarter | Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22–25 → | $0 | $0 | $9,718 | $63K |
| 26–29 → | $0 | $3,190 | $45K | $171K |
| 30–33 → | $0 | $7,685 | $69K | $247K |
| 34–37 → | $0 | $7,250 | $121K | $468K |
| 38–41 → | $0 | $20K | $194K | $737K |
| 42–45 → | $0 | $36K | $289K | $1.0M |
| 46–50 | $0 | $55K | $344K | $1.5M |
| 50–54 → | $0 | $61K | $441K | $1.8M |
| 55–59 → | $0 | $68K | $598K | $2.2M |
| 60–64 → | $0 | $90K | $680K | $2.9M |
| 65 and over → | $0 | $22K | $598K | $2.8M |
Investments at 46–50 by city
| Metro | Lower quarter | Median investments | Upper quarter | Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York City → | $0 | $49K | $306K | $1.3M |
| San Francisco | $0 | $55K | $344K | $1.5M |
| Los Angeles → | $0 | $46K | $281K | $1.2M |
| Chicago → | $0 | $42K | $255K | $1.1M |
| Boston → | $0 | $45K | $276K | $1.2M |
| Washington, DC → | $0 | $46K | $281K | $1.2M |
| Seattle → | $0 | $46K | $286K | $1.2M |
| Austin → | $0 | $43K | $260K | $1.1M |
More for people aged 46–50 in San Francisco
Common questions
How this is built. Percentiles are modeled for this cohort from federal survey microdata — the Federal Reserve's 2025 Survey of Consumer Finances (released October 2026), the BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey (2024), the Census American Community Survey and BLS Occupational Employment & Wage Statistics (May 2025) — with metro cost-of-living and wage adjustments. As Keeping Up members in this cohort grow, the band blends toward anonymized, aggregated live data (minimum cohort sizes apply; no individual is ever identifiable). Seeded figures are household-level, as in the SCF; live cohorts are individual-level. Amounts are in current dollars. Read the full methodology.
Last updated October 2026. Cohort: people aged 46–50 in San Francisco. Model sample basis: 120.